Which Dino should be on the logo?

Somewhere on a remote island there lie no fences, no power, and no plot. Explore the amazing world of the Universal Studios potential known as Jurassic Park IV. (Spoilers Allowed!)
User avatar
KyleRipman
a hunter
Posts: 285
Joined: 03 Dec 2002, 17:56
Location: PA
Contact:

Re:Which Dino should be on the logo?

Post by KyleRipman »

As would I.
User avatar
Chaotic_Baryonyx
a hunter
Posts: 295
Joined: 08 Nov 2002, 13:44
Contact:

Re:Which Dino should be on the logo?

Post by Chaotic_Baryonyx »

Umm, Nagisa, I don't know quite how big Daspletosaurus is, but I do know that for the moment at least Tarbosaurus Bataar is Tyrannosaurus Bataar. Thus it is a subspecies of Tyrannosaurus and doesn't count. But then again, the classification of the T. Bataar seems to change every week or so, so you might be right.
Mexisaurus

Re:Which Dino should be on the logo?

Post by Mexisaurus »

No, you're wrong, Tyrannosaurus bataar was reasigned to Tarbosaurus bataar, so the only valid Tyrannosaurus genus is Tyrannosaurus rex.
User avatar
JPController
a hunter
Posts: 333
Joined: 10 Nov 2002, 16:30
Gender: Male
Location: Oklahoma
Contact:

Re:Which Dino should be on the logo?

Post by JPController »

I agree, the t-rex would bring back the old ways of JP. And I would love to see the t-rex logo again.
Image
JPD VET DJP3 VET InGenNet VET
Site B Owner
User avatar
Chaotic_Baryonyx
a hunter
Posts: 295
Joined: 08 Nov 2002, 13:44
Contact:

Re:Which Dino should be on the logo?

Post by Chaotic_Baryonyx »

[quote author=Mexisaurus link=board=9;threadid=2070;start=60#msg32206 date=1058466720]<br />No, you're wrong, Tyrannosaurus bataar was reasigned to Tarbosaurus bataar, so the only valid Tyrannosaurus genus is Tyrannosaurus rex.<br /><hr></blockquote><br /><br />When did this happen? Not that I don't believe you, it happened several times before.<br /><br />[quote author=JPController link=board=9;threadid=2070;start=60#msg32207 date=1058467441]<br />And I would love to see the t-rex logo again.<br /><hr></blockquote><br />Just look at your JP DVD or VHS. /tongue.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":P" border="0" alt="tongue.gif" />
Anonymous

Re:Which Dino should be on the logo?

Post by Anonymous »

It all depends on who you ask. Some say Tyrannosaurus bataar as it is so close to T.rex, others say Tarbosaurus bataar and some have even assigned it to an entirely differant genus namely Jengizkhan bataar. J. bataar is called so as these scientists believe the name Tarbosaurus should be restricted to smaller species of 8metres in lenght or smaller such as Tarbosaurus efremovi.<br />There is also talk that the T.rex Sue may be a differant species of Tyrannosaurus, namely T. imperator. They say this mainly because its lower jaw is somewhat differant to other T.rexes.
User avatar
RaptorAlien
an egg
Posts: 20
Joined: 26 Apr 2003, 01:41
Contact:

Re:Which Dino should be on the logo?

Post by RaptorAlien »

Tyrant Lizard Emperor eh? Lol, not bad...
User avatar
Nagisa
a wonderer
Posts: 443
Joined: 27 Jun 2003, 21:15
Contact:

Re:Which Dino should be on the logo?

Post by Nagisa »

[quote author=Chaotic_Baryonyx link=board=9;threadid=2070;start=60#msg32210 date=1058471343]<br />[quote author=Mexisaurus link=board=9;threadid=2070;start=60#msg32206 date=1058466720]<br />No, you're wrong, Tyrannosaurus bataar was reasigned to Tarbosaurus bataar, so the only valid Tyrannosaurus genus is Tyrannosaurus rex.<br /><hr></blockquote><br /><br />When did this happen? Not that I don't believe you, it happened several times before.<br /><hr></blockquote><br /><br />Like you said, it seems to change every week. Until I get definitive word one way or another, though, I'm just going to stick with Tarbosaurus.<br /><br />And Daspletosaurus was bigger than Albertosaurus, but just barely. It was about a meter or so longer and slightly heavier.
Anime-Haven

"Thou shalt break them with a rod of iron; thou shalt dash them to pieces like a potter's vessel. Be wise now therefore, O ye kings: be instructed, ye judges of the earth. Serve the [b]Lord[/b] with [i]fear[/i], and [i]rejoice[/i] with [i]trembling[/i]. Kiss the Son, lest He be angry, and ye perish from the man, when His wrath is kindled but a little. Arise, O Lord; let not man prevail: let the heathen be judged in Thy sight. I shall purify all with a single blow. Mine enemies stand before mine eyes. Who shall mourn for Division XIII? Who shall mourn for the [i]Vatican[/i]?"
[i]--Father Alexander Anderson, [b]Hellsing[/b][/i]
Mexisaurus

Re:Which Dino should be on the logo?

Post by Mexisaurus »

[quote author=Nagisa link=board=9;threadid=2070;start=60#msg32245 date=1058481506]<br />[quote author=Chaotic_Baryonyx link=board=9;threadid=2070;start=60#msg32210 date=1058471343]<br />[quote author=Mexisaurus link=board=9;threadid=2070;start=60#msg32206 date=1058466720]<br />No, you're wrong, Tyrannosaurus bataar was reasigned to Tarbosaurus bataar, so the only valid Tyrannosaurus genus is Tyrannosaurus rex.<br /><hr></blockquote><br /><br />When did this happen? Not that I don't believe you, it happened several times before.<br /><hr></blockquote><br /><br />Like you said, it seems to change every week. Until I get definitive word one way or another, though, I'm just going to stick with Tarbosaurus.<br /><br />And Daspletosaurus was bigger than Albertosaurus, but just barely. It was about a meter or so longer and slightly heavier.<br /><hr></blockquote><br /><br />Yeah, it has been changing a lot, but for now, it's Tarbosaurus bataar.
Anonymous

Re:Which Dino should be on the logo?

Post by Anonymous »

Did you not read my post? It all depens on who you ask! Its like the way some scientists catagorise Shuuvia as a bird and otheers a dinosaur. There is no holy tomb called the big book of correct dinosaur knoledge where you find out all the answers. Everything is debatable!
Post Reply