Posted: 25 Jul 2004, 05:47
QUOTE Well, it has been a while since I've read the novel, but I'm still a skeptic until I re-read Jurassic Park. I'm betting that what you're talking about is only a hinted explanation for the JP3 raptors, because I really doubt that the film makers would put in that much of an effort for it to fit seamlessly with the continuity of the novels.[/quote]
No, it doesn't say anywhere that they manipulated the animals in such a way that they differed vastly. The key to this idea is that the passage mentions Wu felt compelled to use any DNA he wished because it was all fundamentally the same to him. So, it's possible a different version of a given species would incorporate DNA from different living species, and therefore produce a creature that subtly differs from another version. I don't really believe they'd just throw in new raptors without having thought about how to make it seem sensible. They did try to use things from both novels that we didn't get to see in the other films, so I feel it's a safe bet that they used that chapter as the basis for being able to add a new look to the raptors. From a film-making standpoint, continuity is something that has to be considered carefully in order to at least minimize any overt flubs that may harm how enjoyable the film is to watch. Of course, the JP films have some clear inconsistencies in themselves, but I don't see that in this detail.
Continuity between the movies and novels is hit and miss, at best, so try not to confuse what I'm trying to say. Fitting the movies and novels together as a single universe just won't work because many things were altered in adapting the story to a cinematic format. Many of the ideas that make JP such a wonderful and entertaining idea were taken from Crichton's writing, but they have to remain separate from each other. Something that exists within the novels may not exist within the films and the reverse is also true, so there's no way they could fit seemlessly at all. That was never what I was trying to imply.
No, it doesn't say anywhere that they manipulated the animals in such a way that they differed vastly. The key to this idea is that the passage mentions Wu felt compelled to use any DNA he wished because it was all fundamentally the same to him. So, it's possible a different version of a given species would incorporate DNA from different living species, and therefore produce a creature that subtly differs from another version. I don't really believe they'd just throw in new raptors without having thought about how to make it seem sensible. They did try to use things from both novels that we didn't get to see in the other films, so I feel it's a safe bet that they used that chapter as the basis for being able to add a new look to the raptors. From a film-making standpoint, continuity is something that has to be considered carefully in order to at least minimize any overt flubs that may harm how enjoyable the film is to watch. Of course, the JP films have some clear inconsistencies in themselves, but I don't see that in this detail.
Continuity between the movies and novels is hit and miss, at best, so try not to confuse what I'm trying to say. Fitting the movies and novels together as a single universe just won't work because many things were altered in adapting the story to a cinematic format. Many of the ideas that make JP such a wonderful and entertaining idea were taken from Crichton's writing, but they have to remain separate from each other. Something that exists within the novels may not exist within the films and the reverse is also true, so there's no way they could fit seemlessly at all. That was never what I was trying to imply.